JADURAM: THE FALL GUY OF A DEFECTIVE AUCKLAND COUNCIL

 JADURAM: THE FALL GUY OF A DEFECTIVE AUCKLAND COUNCIL

Thakur Ranjit Singh

As a senior alumni of the former National Minister, Steven Joyce at Massey University, and an MBA postgraduate student at Palmerston North campus in 1982, I consider myself more than qualified to comment on the governance issue of Auckland Council, dubious events at Watercare and questions on fiduciary duties of its Board.

As somebody who sat in boards of a Bank, Suva City Council and a Media organisation in Fiji, among others. I consider myself more than qualified to comment on this issue. With my past trade, commerce, industry and real-life experience, I was saddened to see fellow Fijian, CEO of Watercare, Raveen Jaduram being made a fall guy of a dysfunctional organisation, a questionable Board and poor leadership from Auckland Council.

RAVEEN JADURAM - CEO of Watercare, who was forced to resign because of problems at the organisation which can equally be attributed to Auckland Council and Watercare Board, which were sleeping on the job. He was made the fall guy of inefficiencies wide across Auckland Council (NZ Herald Photo)

From the thick smoke emitting from Watercare crisis, the only light seems to be coming from a brave and conscientious councillor who seem to have conscience and guts (read balls) to say that the emperor has no clothes on.

Councillor Daniel Newman, who had worked at the Watercare praised its CEO Jaduram for a grand job he had done in the past. While the fall guy was primarily targeted for his huge salary, however the Mayor, Council CEO and the Board of Watercare are equally to blame for planning failures. Ultimately, CEO of Watercare is not accountable - the ball stops at the Mayor and the Chair of the Board.

As a migrant from a Third World Fiji who attended university in NZ in 1980s, I was perturbed at the lack of any academic teachings of my time in the current management of Auckland Council. Have good management theories of yesteryears gone obsolete now? Are overpaid and highly qualified officials and board members at Auckland Council and Watercare so blatantly clueless, incompetent and ignorant about good management practices in strategic management, forward planning and good perceptive governance?

PHIL GOFF, Mayor, and STEPHEN TOWN, former CEO of Auckland Council. They both cannot wash their hands off the problems at Watercare, a Council Controlled Organisation, (CCO). They failed to monitor it and also failed to monitor a Watercare Board that had been sleeping on the job. They are equally accountable for problems at Watercare. (NZ Herald Photo)

Boards in Fiji required visionary short-term (current year) mid–term (5 years) and long-term (10 years) plans with proper brainstorming and assessment of exhaustive environmental factors. Among others, this included SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) for strategic planning. The fact that the big brains in Auckland’s main city failed these basics in management shames their universities and business schools for having alumni with questionable qualifications and aptitude for the respective positions. This applies to the Mayor, the Chairwoman and board members of Watercare and former CEO of Auckland Council who all revealed very wanting management and leadership skills and aptitude in letting down Watercare. 

What is further disgraceful and appalling is the manner in which poor Kiwi Fiji Indian was thrown in front of a bus by the people who all deserved to go under the same bus themselves.  The career and professional Chairwoman, Margaret Devlin and her Board owed a fiduciary duty of care to safeguard interests of Auckland ratepayers.

Together with the mayor and (former) CEO of Auckland Council, they all failed us. Were they sleeping on the job while Auckland drowned in a drought?  I suggest the Chamber of Commerce, the Institute of Directors or the relevant organisation to audit the action, or lack of it, of the Board of Watercare, and its dereliction of its fiduciary duties. And business schools in Universities need to use this debacle at Watercare as a case study on how not to run such a crucial organisation.

In fact Councillor Newman very aptly described the Watercare Board: 

"The board has been as active as an Easter Island statue. There has been a complete absence of energy and it's been left to the governing body of council to work with senior management within Watercare to fill the gap"

Did the Board and Auckland Council ask and seek the right and prudent questions and answers? Newman has also questioned the suitability of this Hamilton-based professional board chair who he claims had no interest in Auckland and sits on many other boards outside Auckland.

NZ Herald of Wednesday 19 August, 2020 reported that Chairwoman of Watercare, Margaret Devlin is paid $108,000 when the median of similar Chair of director’s fee is $60,000. It also reported that this professional board chair is also involved with some other ten or so organisations:

"As well as chairing Watercare, Devlin is a director of Waikato Regional Airport, MetService, IT Partners Group, Aurora Energy, independent chairwoman of Waikato District Council's audit and risk committee, chairwoman of Women in Infrastructure Network advisory board, councillor at Waikato University, deputy chairwoman of Wintec, chairwoman of Lyttelton Port Company, director of Infrastructure NZ and chairwoman of Hospice Waikato. Last month, the Tasman District Council appointed her to the board of Waimea Water."

MARGARET DEVLIN, Chairwoman of Watercare is paid $108,000 fee by Auckland Council when a comparable median fee is $60,000. She, as a professional Director, sits on some 11 other boards, most of them out of Auckland.  She owed fiduciary duties to Auckland ratepayers, and she and the Board need to be sacked, as they cannot be relied upon to serve the new CEO of Watercare, as they already failed us ratepayers miserably.(NZ Herald Photo)

Perhaps ratepayers of Auckland City need to ask the mayor how could a person involved with so many organisations with so many diverse interests be depended on to look after such a major City portfolio? And how could she do justice to this highly paid directorship with so many roles away from Auckland?

Aucklanders would be justified to seek immediate removal of the whole Watercare Board which could not now be trusted to provide prudent direction to the incoming CEO. They already failed us miserably.

In other civilised City Councils, the poor-performing Chairperson and the Board, with the CEO and the Mayor of Council would have lost their jobs.

Unfortunately, in a wanting culture at Auckland Council, a lesser CEO is made the fall guy of an organisation where the overseers were all sleeping on the job while the dams ran dry.

[Thakur Ranjit Singh is a media commentator, a journalist and community worker. He runs his blog FIJI PUNDIT. E-mail:thakurjifj@gmail.com]

JANAM ASTMI SPECIAL 3 – SOME FATHER-SON RELATIONS DURING TIMES OF KRISHN

JANAM ASTMI SPECIAL 3 – SOME FATHER-SON RELATIONS DURING TIMES OF KRISHN 

                                   Thakur Ranjit Singh

As Janam Astmi and Father’s Day tend to fall almost around same time in Southern hemisphere, a comparison of some father-son relations of Dwapar Yug (during times of Krishn) would be relevant, as they are very rarely told. These are summaries of some father-son relations, which are not exhaustive-there are others.

Hope our Parcharaks/ Pundits could add on to them and make their parvachan a bit more interesting which relate to, and be relevant to our present day, rather than in abstract (out of touch, intellectual) stories. 

1) KRISHN- VASUDEV/NAND: we always talk about two mothers of Krishn, but fail to mention His TWO FATHERS. Vasudev who faced all sorts of troubles and dangers to take his son away from life-threatening situation (in Mathura) to safety and care of Nand (in Gokul) who looked after that son who was not his, like his own. This story balances off all the negative tales of "sautelapan (of adopted children). 

A very exemplary relationship where the son shone as a pride for both pairs of His parents. 

2) ARJUN -ABHIMANYU: Abhimanyu was a son who raised the profile of his warrior father by sacrificing his life, knowing that he would not be able to complete the "Chakravyuh" - he could only enter it but could not come out of it alive. 

This episode also substantiates the medical science that children are affected by their environment when in the mother's womb. Abhimanyu was still in his mother's womb when he first heard his uncle Krishn telling Subhadra (Krishn’s sister) about the secret of the almost impenetrable military formation known as the Chakravyuh. But then Subhadra fell asleep while listening to Krishn's story, and so the unborn child was able to hear only part of the secret. Hence he could not break out of it alive, and hence sacrificed his life for honour of his father and clan. 

Any father would be proud of a son like Abhimanyu. 

3) DHRITRASTRA- DURYODHAN: This was the most unholy relation between a father and a son. It is a lesson to all fathers that they should not spoil their sons and submit to all their demands in selfishness for glory of their sons, and accept their unrighteous (sinful, wrong) acts silently. That resulted in complete annihilation (destruction) of Kauravs and vansh (lineage) of the blind father, who was literally as well as spiritually blind. 

While this aptly applies to a father-son relation in Fiji politics, I will refrain to name them. At times the downfall of a father is the "ucchi - kanchaaye" or selfish greed for success of the son, who, like Duryodhan, turns out to be an evil devil. A father who blindly overlooks the bad deeds of his son would end up like complete destruction of Kaurav lineage. Love for a son should never blind the father of the choice between the right and the wrong. Dritrastra was such a blind father, in all respects of blindness.

Pray you do not have a son like Duryodhan (or even a ‘blind’ father.) 

4) BHIM-GHATOTKATCH - Very rarely mentioned in our parvachan, but a son of Bhism, born through an ogre (rachasi) woman from lineage of Hidimba. This son was the salvation of Pandavas in Mahabharat and was instrumental in victory of Pandavs. Karan was forced to use the deadly and sure-shot weapon reserved for death of Arjun on Ghatotkach. Even born in a rachas kul or of low-maternal association, we pray that we have a son like him who stand for his father and his lineage and heritage.

Ghatotkach was an exemplary son. 

5) UGRASEN-KANS: The less said, the better. Ugrasen was Nana (maternal grandfather) of Krishn, and was imprisoned by his own son, Kans.

But we still have present-day sons like Kans who usurps the property of their parents and disown and discard them. Pray nobody has a son like him who was also very unkind and brutal to his sister Devaki and brother – in-law (Bahnoi) Vasudev. 

Contrary to belief of some that Kans was equivalent to Ravan of Treta Yuga, this was not so. Equivalent of Ravan and Kumbhkaran in Dwapar Yug were Shishupal and Dantavakr, who both were killed by Krishn. 

Pray none of you get a son, brother or Mama like Kans. 

6) SANTANU-BHISHAM PITAMAH: Thankful are fathers who have a son like Bhisham, who sacrifices his 'Jawani" and whole life, and vows not to marry for the happiness of his father. How many sons we have now, who will agree to their father remarrying, for the happiness of his father, after death of their mother? I have seen sons who object to happiness of their widower fathers having a companion after death of their mother. Great are those who can be as understanding and act like Bhisham for happiness of their fathers. 

Pray that we have sons like Bhisham Pitamah. 

7) GURU DRON - ASHWATHAMA: While considered an avatar of Lord Shiv and being son of such a sage, the fact that Ashwathama sided with unrighteous (sinful) Kauravas, he lost all praises, especially when he vents on killing the Pandavs. Hence, it teaches us "sangat seh gunn aaye, sangatt se gunn jaaye (the company of a child determines his character). Even born of good and righteous parents, a child in wrong company will be like this son of Guru Dron. 

Hence all fathers need to be wary of this. To remain a pride to them, parents need to ensure their sons are in the right company. 

I hope these synopsis and thoughts on father-son relationships will generate interest to delve deeper into these subjects. After a happy and fruitful Janam Astmi, FIJI PUNDIT wishes you all a very Happy Father’s Day coming shortly in the Southern Hemisphere. (First Sunday in September) 

[About the Author: Thakur Ranjit Singh is a journalist and a media commentator, and runs his blog FIJI PUNDIT. He is originally from Fiji and is based in Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: thakurjifj@gmail.com]

GOVERDHAN DHARI KRISHN: THE STORY BEHIND COW WORSHIP AFTER DIWALI DAY

HOW GOVERDHAN - DHARI KRISHN KILLS EGO AND GIVES RESPECT TO NATURE

                                          Thakur Ranjit Singh

We grew up learning about how a child Krishn lifted up Goverdhan hill to save his people from the wrath, anger of rain god Indr.

The people of the forest of Vrindavan had a custom of offering elaborate meals to Lord Indr, the Rain (and storm) God. They did so to please him enough to be blessed with timely rainfall and good harvests.

Goverdhan -Dhari Krishn - when Indr showed his anger at people who rejected him to pray to Goverdhan, Krishn used the hill as a shelter to protect his devotees.

One year, a young Krishn questioned this by saying that was a burden on poor people. As food for people and grass for cows were given by Goverdhan hill, so why should they pray to Indr. And hence the villagers, on advice and logic of Krishn, offered food and offerings to Goverdhan Parvat (hill) instead of Indr, as they had done as a past custom.

This angered Indr and he sent down torrential rain and thunderstorms to the region of Vrindavan. The storm went on for days and the village soon started drowning in the ensuing floods. It is then that the people begged for Krishn’s help, who advised them to move towards the Goverdhan hill. Once there, he lifted the whole hill with his little finger, urging everyone to come under the hill to take shelter from the storm, and thus saving them from the wrath of Indr.

This incident is seen to represent how God will protect all devotees who take singular refuge in him. Bhagwan ke sharan mein jaao, Rakscha karenge.

Hinduism and Lord Krishn always loved nature - its landscape, rivers and creatures. And Cow is something he is very fond of and this love for cows today is the cheapest source of protein to mankind-with its milk, and bullocks to plough the field. And hence Krishn is called GOPAL, a protector of cows.

It also shows our love for nature, the hills, the mountains, the greeneries that sustain life. 

But most importantly, it depicts defeat of EGO, ghamand, self-importance, pride, conceit and snobbery over love, logic, compassion and humbleness of a child Lord. 

Indr accepted defeat and even pleaded safety of his son, Arjun, and Krishn was true to his vow to always protect Arjun, who was deemed to be Indr’s son, and Krishn’s Bahnoi, married to Krishn’s sister, Subhadra.

The other important aspect of Goverdhan Parvat is its link to Ramayan in Treta Yug. According to another folklore, this mountain was in fact first lifted by Hanuman. 

When Devtas abused their position and powers, like powerful and rich humans, it needs the action of the Almighty to shatter their pride-and EGO. The Goverdhan Parvat episode reveals this.

The incident dates back to the days of Ramayan. When Ram had to cross the sea to reach Lanka, a bridge had to be built. The bridge which later came to be known as Ram Setu needed a great deal of stones to be built.

Hearing this, Hanuman who was bestowed with special powers, flew to the Himalayas and plucked out a huge hill. However, on his journey back, he learnt that the bridge had already been constructed.

So, he left the hill, the Parvat in Vrindavan. Hearing this, the mountain was deeply saddened thinking that he will be of no use to Lord Ram. Sensing his condition, Hanuman told the hill (which was Goverdhan Parvat) that in the Dwapar Yuga, when Ram would incarnate as Krishn, the mountain will be lifted by Krishn, and would serve God by sheltering Krishn’s loved ones.

Goverdhan hill was initially carried by Hanuman for building the bridge (Setu) during Treta Yug, but it was abandoned in Vrindavan when it was not needed. Upon boon and advice of Hanuman that Lord Krishn would use it in Dwapar, the hill awaited arrival of Gopal.

So, after Hanuman had first lifted the hill, and left it in Vrindavan, Lord Krishn lifted it again and today it is a revered place that it is worshiped by hundreds of people every day. 

And this day is especially marked as Goverdhan Pooja after Diwali Day every year. Such small tales from Krishna Lila give us immense knowledge and lessons to be better human beings.

LESSONS FROM GOVERDHAN POOJA

1) Be the medium of change to remove outdated or thoughtless practises we regard as tradition, parampara. Ram did that to stop the tradition of killing Ashvamedha horse in Ajodhya (before marriage). Krishna stopped this outdated and meaningless ritual. Hindus need to embrace change, as lessons from our scriptures promote.

2) Stop abusing your positions, either as a politician or as a normal person. Indr did that by abusing his rainmaking powers to flood Gokul for his personal revenge. He was taught a lesson that there are others more powerful than the abuser.

3) Don’t take bribes for doing what you are supposed to do. Indr is to provide rainfall, as God of Rain, and should not take bribe of Pooja from people to do what he should do as a duty. Like Indr, one should not mistake obligation for a right to demand bribe from people to undertake your normal obligations.

4) Control your ego,(ahankaar) or self-importance, have compassion (kindness), and perform your tasks loyally, without abuse of position or power. Krishn shattered Indr’s ego - self-importance.

5) God will protect all devotees who take singular refuge in Him. Bhagwan ke sharan mein jaao, Rakscha karenge.

6) Love and respect nature, the hills, the mountains, the rivers, the forests, and the greeneries that sustain life. Please do not pollute rivers and waterways.

Wish you a Happy Goverdhan Pooja, and hope you will be wiser with lessons and teachings from this episode of Lord Krishn.

[About the Author: Thakur Ranjit Singh is a journalist and a media commentator, and runs his blog FIJI PUNDIT. He is originally from Fiji and is based in Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: thakurjifj@gmail.com]

JANAM ASTMI SPECIAL 1- RANCHOR: WHEN RETREAT IS THE BEST DEFENSE

 JANAM ASTMI SPECIAL 1

RANCHOR: WHEN RETREAT IS THE BEST DEFENSE

Thakur Ranjit Singh

When growing up as “Ranjit” (winner in battle) in Fiji, I was somewhat surprised, and in fact amused to see that sections of Gujarati community had name quite the opposite of mine –“Ranchor” (runner from battle)

It was till very late in life that I knew that Ranchor was in fact one of the names of Lord Krishn.

Many may feel awkward to call Krishn as Ranchor. While people in Punjab and North India name their children “Ranjit”, Gujarati community tend to name their sons as “Ranchor” because of their closeness to Krishn, as this is one of his names.

But yes, Krishn does not mind this name – I will tell about two incidents that gave Krishn this name and that you rarely get explained in detail by your Parcharaks. 

Lord Krishn gave us many lessons from Mahabharat, and He taught us to be smart to win many battles in life.

The first is when Krishn leaves Mathura to escape attacks from Jarasandh who was father-in-law, Sasur of Kansa who Krishn killed. Krishn believes that at times it is best defence to retreat, avoid a confrontation which can be very destructive to the community and common people -aam aadmi.

Hence, he moves from Mathura to Dwarika, an under-sea city. So when Jarasandh came with his army to attack Mathura, he found it empty, and gave Krishn the name Ranchor.

There is another version of this tag “Ranchor”. After death of Kansa, Jarasandh forged friendship with Kalyavan, who was very powerful, and undefeated. He came with an army of 3 million, which far outnumbered Krishna’s army.

Kalyavan challenged Krishna to a duel, and Krishn lures him to a cave where he knew Muchukund (from Treta Yuga, and forebear of Lord Ram) was in a very deep sleep after battle with Assurs (demons)

Sage Muchukund's sleep was disturbed by Kalyavan, who was led into the cave by Krishn. The enemy of Krishn, Kalyavan burns to death without a fight. 

Muchukund, after long battles wanted undisturbed, very deep sleep. Hence, Indr gave him a vardaan (boon) that anybody who disturbs his sleep would be burnt to ashes once he sees him.

Krishn leads Kalyavan into the cave, and seeing Muchukund deep asleep, he puts his shawl – the yellow cloth (pitambar) on the sleeping sage and hid behind a boulder.

Kalyavan mistakenly assumes that Krishna is lying there because the sage had Krishn’s cloth on him. Hence, he kicks him and swears at Krishn for running away. That disturbs the sleep, the sage wakes up, and the light and fire from his eyes burn Kalyavan to ashes.

This article informs the readers as to why Lord Krishn was called RANCHOR -somebody who runs away from a fight. But it also gives a lesson to us that at times, retreat is the best defense.

The lesson we learn from these ‘Ranchor” episodes is that we should be humble , smart, expedient and level-headed to know when to choose your battles and when to walk or run away from a situation which is far better than unnecessary conflicts, family disputes and confrontation.

And what is in a name – coward, darpok or Ranchor. Krishn teaches you to be smart, he is Ranchor, so what? We still worship him for his wisdom.

We learn to be brave and smart in being called a coward. At times, retreat is the best defence - be smart like Krishn - withdraw from fights and battles you need not be bothered with. Let others, situations or environments deal with them.

Have a blessed and enlightened Krishn Janam Astmi.

[About the Author: Thakur Ranjit Singh is a journalist and a media commentator, and runs his blog FIJI PUNDIT. He is originally from Fiji and is based in Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: thakurjifj@gmail.com]