PK: When a drunk makes you sober
and challenges religious bigots
Thakur Ranjit Singh
PK movie seems to have ruffled quite a few dhotis and beards of
religious some fraud Godmen who have been thriving on ignorance and religion of fear in
their subjects and devotees. Despite all protests and objections saying that
this movie degrades Hinduism, nobody could produce a coherent argument in defense of that. Even the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking a ban
on it, through lack of evidence. There
have been no facts to defend this claim. As a Hindu, I do not find anything offensive,
and similar view comes from educated and religiously-enlightened Hindus in my Indo-Fijian
Diaspora.
When I started watching this movie, I was
reminded of my visit with my father to a so-called Mandir of Pujari Ram Sewak
in Balevuto, Ba, Fiji, some 10km in interior of Ba town. That was some 45 years
ago and I was a DAV, Ba, form 3 student, with an eye- strain or pain in the
eye. My father, being a religious and righteous person, was also a believer in Mandir
and the ability of pujaris and so-called priests to solve human problems.
Priest, ojha or pujari are modern day witch doctors or Godmen, who pretend they
have shadow of Gods /Goddesses and possess extraordinary powers to heal. When
my turn came, the “possessed” Pujari told me that I had received a love-letter
from a girl in my class, and that letter has “karal” or spell-binding bhabhut
or ashes that was causing me the pain. (I
wondered if she loved me, why she would cause me pain.) Seeing my father having
so much faith, I found myself in a dilemma, hence lied for his faith, that what
was said by the pujari was the truth. I never then had any girlfriend or
received any letters, and when I did she was from a different class and
religion. And I was given some rituals which had no bearing to my eye-pain,
same sort of fraud that the movie PK has been trying to portray to people.
Hence I got enlightened over four decades ago and have since been fighting
against these sort of fraud and religious bigotry depicted in PK.
The synopsis of Raj Kumar Hirani’s and Vidhu
Vinod Chopra’s PK is that an alien research team lands on a Rajasthan desert to
study humans. (I named the producers to show the decision-makers of the film
are non-Muslims.). Amir Khan lands stark
naked, as those aliens remain unclothed. His tracking remote, that helps him
send signals back to his spaceship, gets stolen, and that kicks off the rough
trip of this alien. He has to find the remote to contact his spaceship and till
then survive on earth on his own. He is unaware of our ways, manners or
language, and meets with Sanjay Dutt who becomes his dear friend and assists
him with life here. He learns the language and manners from a prostitute, whose
hand he holds for some six hours to transfer and “copy” all human knowledge to
him. Thus he learns Bhojpuri language and steals from “rocking cars” in remote
places where couple are having sex. He comes to Delhi in search of the remote,
and then begins the tumultuous and lightening pace of the story in an unknown
city. Like a baby child, this alien (named PK, which means a drunk in Hindi
“Pee Key aya hai”) asks questions that despite their innocence hold a valuable
and deep meaning. He teams up with beautiful Jagat “Jaggu”Janani (Anushka
Sharma) on this journey and PK challenges some of the oldest rituals of
religion that are ruling life of people on earth. In search of his remote,
PK stumbles on to the hypocrisy and deceit in organised religion. He then sets
about exposing a Hindu “Godman”, a term for a particularly charismatic guru who
may claim to have paranormal powers, and ability to speak to God (We have
Indian palm readers and astrologers, promoted by Indian media in Auckland. In
Fiji this is an old joke where some witchdoctors speak to God, using shank or
conch-shell.)
The good side of human being is shown through Sanjay Dutt who becomes PK's friend and assists him to settle on earth, and helps him search for his missing remote control. |
The underlying theme is that there are two types of Gods: one
that created all of us, and the other that we have created individually that
creates so much confusion for this being from one outer planet. PK is told that a Hindu woman wearing white is a widow while he
gets ear-bashing for passing condolences to a white-dressed Christian bride,
for the death of her husband. He is told Christian widows wear black, and hence
expressing sorrow to Muslim ladies in black burka, gets almost bashed by the
husband(Lucky 4 wives, and how many children?) He is chucked out of Church for
taking coconut, essence and prasad and breaking it on the altar. He is told
Christian God loves wine, and gets abused for taking wine to a Mosque. This confusion reigns in PKs mind when he
meets a person dressed as Lord Shiv in a toilet and confronts him to seek for
his remote, he chases him through town to the ashram of the Godman where he
sees his remote, which the Godman uses to fool people to speak to God. He
claims it is from Kailash but in fact had been sold to him by the thief for
40,000 rupees. PK uses his skills to expose the fraud and dishonesty of the
Godman, reveals that he is ringing the “wrong number”, and not getting to the
proper God, and helps Jaggu find her Pakistani lover, who she had lost through
misinformation from the Godman.
Religion of fear is well
depicted when, outside an exam hall PK picks up a stone, puts a sindoor
(vermillion) tikka on it and throws some coins in front. You have long queue of
people coming to worship and donate. This is equivalent to what my school head
teacher, Master Dharam Dutt Sharma, a liberated and educated Brahmin, told the
class half a century ago: if a dog shits and it is in form of a snake or when a
mushroom germinates from under a floor in shape of a snake, people will run
with milk, flowers and prasad to pray to it. We have had cases in Fiji, with one
Hanuman with a tail, a cow with three eyes and unusual phenomenon of nature which
is used as religious rituals and money, offering of prasad and flowers come
into the play. Somebody makes money in this madness.
\
There is nothing in the movie that degrades Hinduism or any other
religion. Some object to Shankar in a toilet. So, if any
actor dresses like Shankar (as we used to do in Ram Lila), where would you
expect him to piss and go for a smoke break? In a kitchen or a toilet, or does
he need to go to Kailash for that?
And how about putting milk on stone while so many are starving? What is wrong
with that reasoning? That has been previously debated on social media and seen
as ungodly by educated people. People have started making comparison to Islam
and why it has been spared. Amir Khan is the worker, the actor in the film, the
decision-makers on the story or scene are not his –they are non-Muslims. And
anyway, the producers and directors may have been expedient to avoid death and
danger, as there is no other religion as democratic, accepting and
accommodating as Hinduism, where unlike other religions, we are told that
change is inevitable. Gita had warned Hindus about bad and unholy practices
becoming part of religious rituals. My final answer to that is the not-so-famous
dialogue of film “Deewaar”: Doosro ke jurm ginaane se apne kum nahin hote – by
talking about crimes, bad deeds and sins of others, yours do not become any
lesser.
Despite all protests and objections saying that this movie
degrades Hinduism, nobody could produce a coherent argument in defence of that. Even the
Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking a ban on it on the ground that it
defames Hindu culture and religious practices. There have been generalised
talk and a great deal of hot air, but no facts. As a Hindu, I do not find
anything offensive, and similar view comes from educated and
religiously-enlightened Hindus in Indo-Fijian Diaspora. If anything, the movie PK, after OMG and Singham Returns, warns us against
being gullible and teaches to reason out things without blindly committing
stupidity by being with the crowd of sheep. We should stop nonsensical
practices under the guise of being culturally-correct, conforming and
unquestionably following action of forbears who were themselves in darkness,
influenced by religious bigots who thrived without the type of boldness coming
out of PK.
[About the Author: Thakur Ranjit Singh is an Auckland-based Indo-Fijian,
tracing his roots to Karouli, Rajasthan, India. He runs FIJI PUNDIT blog site
which says things that other media tend to shove under the carpet. It has been
a front-runner in raising social, religious, cultural and political issues in
Fiji and India that affect our people. He may be unpopular with orthodox
religious persons and organisations, which find his views outrageous, as they
have found PK]